Ray v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ray v. State

109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 690

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Ala. App. 687 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 1, 1926·No. 7 Div. 267.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant (with two others not on trial) was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment of conviction he appealed. The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. As the record is without error, the judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant (with two others not on trial) was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment of conviction he appealed. The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. As the record is without error, the judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Ray v. State, 109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 690 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

109 So. 926 (Ray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.