Ray v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Ray v. State

109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 690

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 1, 1926

Docket7 Div. 267.

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 926 (Ray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ray v. State, 109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 690 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant (with two others not on trial) was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment of conviction he appealed. The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. As the record is without error, the judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant (with two others not on trial) was indicted, tried, and convicted for the offense of distilling, etc., prohibited liquors, and for the possession of a still to be used for that purpose. He was duly sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment of conviction he appealed. The appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. As the record is without error, the judgment of the circuit court, from which this appeal was taken, will stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 926, 21 Ala. App. 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ray-v-state-alactapp-1926.