Rawls v. Nowell
This text of 67 S.E. 187 (Rawls v. Nowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An application was made by the owner of a tract of land to have the lines around it traced and marked by processioners and the county surveyor under the provisions of the Civil Code, §§3243 et seq., and a protest to the return of the processioners was filed by one claiming to be an adjoining landowner. Held:
1. Where the return of the processioners and the plat, with the certificate of the surveyor thereto, does not definitely locate the tract of land around which the lines were alleged to have been traced' and marked, the entire proceedings should be dismissed.
2. It was not proper for the court to order that “said ease be referred back to the processioners for another survey;” and direction is given that the court pass an order dismissing the entire proceedings. Amos v. Parker, 88 Ga. 754 (16 S. E. 200) ; Crawford v. Wheeler, 111 Ga. 870 (36 S. E. 954).
3. The court properly refused to allow the applicant “to amend' the plat of the survey by adding thereto ‘lot No. 99 in the 13th district of said county of Miller.’ ”
.Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 S.E. 187, 133 Ga. 874, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rawls-v-nowell-ga-1910.