Crawford v. Wheeler
This text of 36 S.E. 954 (Crawford v. Wheeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The running and marking by processioners of a line between adjoining landowners, where no boundary line had been previously located and established, was without authority of law; accordingly the superior court had no jurisdiction of the case made by a protest filed to the return of the processioners fixing such new line.
2. As there was nothing to try, the refusal of a new trial was not erroneous. [871]*871Direction is given that the whole proceeding be dismissed for want of jurisdiction over the subject-matter. Amos v. Parker, 88 Ga. 754.
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 S.E. 954, 111 Ga. 870, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-wheeler-ga-1900.