Crawford v. Wheeler
Opinion
1. The running and marking by processioners of a line between adjoining landowners, where no boundary line had been previously located and established, was without authority of law; accordingly the superior court had no jurisdiction of the case made by a protest filed to the return of the processioners fixing such new line.
2. As there was nothing to try, the refusal of a new trial was not erroneous. [871]*871Direction is given that the whole proceeding be dismissed for want of jurisdiction over the subject-matter. Amos v. Parker, 88 Ga. 754.
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
36 S.E. 954 (Crawford v. Wheeler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.