Walker v. Boyer

48 S.E. 916, 121 Ga. 300, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 116
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1904·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Fish, P. J.

1. The running and marking by processioners oí a line between adjoining landowners, where no boundary line had been previously located and established, was without authority of law; accordingly, the superior court had no jurisdiction of the case made by a protest filed to the return of the processioners fixing such new line.

2. As there was nothing to try, the direction of a verdict by the court was erroneous. Direction is given that the whole proceeding be dismissed for want of jurisdiction over the subject-matter. Crawford v. Wheeler, 111 Ga. 870. Judgment reversed, with direction.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Boyer, 48 S.E. 916, 121 Ga. 300, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 116 (Ga. 1904).

48 S.E. 916 (Walker v. Boyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goodson v. Pope
143 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1965)
Smith v. Clemons
31 S.E.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Veal v. Barber
30 S.E.2d 252 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Standard Oil Co. v. Altman
161 S.E. 353 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Mattox v. DeLoach
123 S.E. 624 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
McAlpin v. Thompson
116 S.E. 64 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Wheeler v. Thomas
77 S.E. 817 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)