Raven v. State

53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 23, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 S.E. 816 (Raven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Raven v. State, 53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45 (Ga. 1906).

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. When a controversy has arisen between counsel for the accused and the solicitor as to whether or not the venue has been proved,, it is not error for the court to state that a witness testified that the offense occurred in the county, such being the fact. It follows, that a motion to declare a mistrial because of such statement by the court was. properly overruled. Wiggins v. State, 80 Ga. 468; Barnes v. State, 89 Ga. 316.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been, shown for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Realty Co. v. Ellis
61 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raven-v-state-ga-1906.