Raven v. State
53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45
Opinion
1. When a controversy has arisen between counsel for the accused and the solicitor as to whether or not the venue has been proved,, it is not error for the court to state that a witness testified that the offense occurred in the county, such being the fact. It follows, that a motion to declare a mistrial because of such statement by the court was. properly overruled. Wiggins v. State, 80 Ga. 468; Barnes v. State, 89 Ga. 316.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been, shown for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Raven v. State, 53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45 (Ga. 1906).
53 S.E. 816 (Raven v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Realty Co. v. Ellis
61 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)