Raven v. State
This text of 53 S.E. 816 (Raven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. When a controversy has arisen between counsel for the accused and the solicitor as to whether or not the venue has been proved,, it is not error for the court to state that a witness testified that the offense occurred in the county, such being the fact. It follows, that a motion to declare a mistrial because of such statement by the court was. properly overruled. Wiggins v. State, 80 Ga. 468; Barnes v. State, 89 Ga. 316.
2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been, shown for reversing the judgment.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/raven-v-state-ga-1906.