Raven v. State

53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 23, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cobb, P. J.

1. When a controversy has arisen between counsel for the accused and the solicitor as to whether or not the venue has been proved,, it is not error for the court to state that a witness testified that the offense occurred in the county, such being the fact. It follows, that a motion to declare a mistrial because of such statement by the court was. properly overruled. Wiggins v. State, 80 Ga. 468; Barnes v. State, 89 Ga. 316.

2. The evidence authorized the verdict, and no sufficient reason has been, shown for reversing the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Raven v. State, 53 S.E. 816, 125 Ga. 58, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 45 (Ga. 1906).

53 S.E. 816 (Raven v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Realty Co. v. Ellis
61 S.E. 832 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)