Barnes v. State

15 S.E. 313, 89 Ga. 316
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 16, 1892·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[316] Judgment affirmed.

The grounds for new trial are, that the verdict is contrary to law and evidence, and that the court erred as follows: The solicitor-general in argument stated that when the witness was first put upon the stand, he testified that the defendant jumped out of the wagon and went off some distance and then went back and got the pistol from the box in the wagon: The defendant’s counsel objected to the making of this statement, whereupon the judge stated in the presence of the jury that he thought the witness had testified as contended by the solicitor-general, repeating the testimony. M. G. Bayne and T. S. Felder, by brief, for plaintiff in error. W. IT. Felton, Jr., solicitor-general, by brief, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. State, 15 S.E. 313, 89 Ga. 316 (Ga. 1892).

15 S.E. 313 (Barnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. State
159 S.E.2d 76 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Rogers
94 S.E. 321 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Stapleton v. State
90 S.E. 1029 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Raven v. State
53 S.E. 816 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)