Rapozo v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rapozo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Haw. 66
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 2021·No. SCWC-16-0000532·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2021 02:15 PM SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 13 OGAC

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

RICHARD RAPOZO, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1PR141000016)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant Richard Rapozo’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 20, 2021, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 27, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rapozo v. State, (haw 2021).

Rapozo v. State (Rapozo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.