Rapozo v. State
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
21-MAY-2024
11:05 AM
Dkt. 10 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
RICHARD RAPOZO, Petitioner, vs.
STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CASE NO. 1PR141000016)
ORDER DENYING PETITION
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Devens, JJ., and Circuit Judge Nakamoto, in place of Ginoza, J., recused)
Upon consideration of the “Motion to Compel Discharge of Movant Pursuant to Ex Parte Lange, 85 U.S. 163 (1874) in effect May 16, 1979” (Motion), filed on March 11, 2024, and the record, we construe the Motion as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. So construed, Petitioner has not demonstrated a special reason for this court to invoke its original jurisdiction in a habeas corpus proceeding. See Oili v. Chang, 57 Haw. 411, 412, 557 P.2d 787, 788 (1976).
It is ordered that the petition is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, May 21, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
/s/ Henry T. Nakamoto
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rapozo v. State (Rapozo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.