Rapozo v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rapozo v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 Haw. 66
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided March 30, 2021·No. SCWC-16-0000532·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 30-MAR-2021 01:12 PM Dkt. 3 ODSAC

SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

RICHARD RAPOZO, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1PR141000016)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court

of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was

filed, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (2017)); see also

Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2016),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner-

Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed March 25,

2021, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application

pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2017) (“The application shall be

filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless

the time for filing the application is extended in accordance

with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 30, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rapozo v. State, (haw 2021).

Rapozo v. State (Rapozo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.