Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets.
This text of Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets. (Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
LISE RAPAPORT AND SEAMUS : No. 94 EM 2014 MCCAFFERY, : : Respondents : : : v. : : : INTERSTATE GENERAL MEDIA, LLC, : WILLIAM MARIMOW, CRAIG MCCOY, : SIGNE WILKINSON, AND MICHAEL : DAYS, : : Petitioners :
ORDER
PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Application for Extraordinary
Relief is DENIED.
Mr. Justice McCaffery did not participate in this matter.
Mr. Chief Justice Castille files a concurring statement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rapaport-l-v-interst-gen-media-pets-pa-2014.