Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 3, 2014·No. 94 EM 2014·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

LISE RAPAPORT AND SEAMUS : No. 94 EM 2014 MCCAFFERY, : : Respondents : : : v. : : : INTERSTATE GENERAL MEDIA, LLC, : WILLIAM MARIMOW, CRAIG MCCOY, : SIGNE WILKINSON, AND MICHAEL : DAYS, : : Petitioners :

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Application for Extraordinary

Relief is DENIED.

Mr. Justice McCaffery did not participate in this matter.

Mr. Chief Justice Castille files a concurring statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Application for Extraordinary

Relief is DENIED.

Mr. Justice McCaffery did not participate in this matter.

Mr. Chief Justice Castille files a concurring statement.

Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets., (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets. (Rapaport, L. v. Interst. Gen. Media, Pets.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.