Randall v. L'Engle
Opinion
In this case Mr. Chief Justice Shackle-ford, the Honorable John W. Malone, Circuit Judge, sitting in the place of Mr. Justice Cockrell,disqualified, and Mr. Justice Whitfield are of the opinion that the decree should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice Hockior and Mr. Justice Parkhill are of the opinion that the decree should be affirmed. Under these [595]*595circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rept. 51; Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. 250, 37 South. Rept. 742; Holton v. Patterson, 49 Fla. 178, 38 South. Rep. 352, and Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co., 51 Fla. 255, 41 South. Rep. 603, an order will be entered affirming the decree. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
52 Fla. 594 (Randall v. L'Engle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.