Holton v. Patterson
49 Fla. 178
Opinion
In this cause the Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Shackleford and Mi*. Justice Carter are of opinion that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Taylor, Mr. Justice IIocker and Mr. Justice Cockrell are of opinion that it should be reversed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. ..... 37 South. Rep. 51, and Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. .... 37 South. Rep. 742, an order will be entered affirming the judgment from which the writ of error was taken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holton v. Patterson, 49 Fla. 178 (Fla. 1905).
49 Fla. 178 (Holton v. Patterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Randall v. L'Engle
52 Fla. 594 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.
51 Fla. 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)