Commercial Bank v. Towers

48 Fla. 250
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1904·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

In this cause the Chief-Justice, Mr. Justice Cockrell and Mr. Justice Shackleford are of opinion that the decrees appealed from should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice Hocicer, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Carter are of the opinion that they should be reversed. Under these circumstances, upon the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, an order will be entered affirming the decrees from which the appeal was taken, at the cost of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commercial Bank v. Towers, 48 Fla. 250 (Fla. 1904).

48 Fla. 250 (Commercial Bank v. Towers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Randall v. L'Engle
52 Fla. 594 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)
Mugge v. Tate, Jones & Co.
51 Fla. 255 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1906)