Randall v. Bell

77 S.E. 1132, 12 Ga. App. 614, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 664
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 16, 1913
Docket4641
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 77 S.E. 1132 (Randall v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Randall v. Bell, 77 S.E. 1132, 12 Ga. App. 614, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 664 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Pottle, J.

The jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals is limited to the “trial and correction of errors in law and equity,” in cases which are subject to review therein. Civil Code, § 6506, A judgment overruling a motion for a new trial is not an error of law which can be corrected in this court, where no material error of law was committed during the trial, and where there is any evidence upon which the verdict could have been based. A verdict can not be set aside by this court [615]*615merely because it is against the weight of evidence. Applying the foregoing to the facts as they appear in the present, record, the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial must be Affirmed.

Decided April 16, 1913. Complaint; from city court of Reiclsville—Judge Collins. September 23,..1912. II. E. Elders, for plaintiff in error. Way & Burlchalter, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Butler v. Reville
130 S.E.2d 161 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Smith v. Barr
122 S.E. 626 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Blalock v. Adams
119 S.E. 465 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Smiley v. Twitty
101 S.E. 584 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Eckman v. State
98 S.E. 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Collins v. Broom
94 S.E. 645 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Copeland v. Hancock
93 S.E. 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Ellis v. Spell
93 S.E. 49 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird
92 S.E. 287 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Hester v. Dreyer
92 S.E. 299 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.E. 1132, 12 Ga. App. 614, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/randall-v-bell-gactapp-1913.