Hester v. Dreyer

92 S.E. 299, 19 Ga. App. 816, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 379
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 25, 1917·No. 8230·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Rloodworth, J.

1. “While a married woman may not contract a debt of suretyship that will hind her, she may, as an original undertaker, become liable for goods furnished to another from which she derives no personal benefit.” Freeman v. Coleman, 86 Ga. 590 (12 S. E. 1064); Finch v. Barclay, 87 Ga. 393 (13 S. E. 566).

2. “A judgment overruling a motion for a new trial is not an error of law which can he corrected in this court, where no material error of law [817] was committed during the trial, and where there is any evidencS upon which the verdict could have been based. A verdict can not be set aside by this court merely because it is against the weight of evidence. Applying the foregoing to the facts as they appear in the present record, the judgment overruling the motion for new trial must be affirmed.” Randall v. Bell, 12 Ga. App. 614 (77 S. E. 1132).

Decided April 25, 1917. Foreclosure of mortgage; from Laureus superior court—Judge Kent. June 1, 1916. Gamp & Twiily, for plaintiff in error. J. S. Adams, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. /., and Jenhins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hester v. Dreyer, 92 S.E. 299, 19 Ga. App. 816, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 379 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

92 S.E. 299 (Hester v. Dreyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allmond v. Mount Vernon Bank
186 S.E. 581 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Lovelady v. Moss
179 S.E. 168 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Boles v. Hartsfield Co.
178 S.E. 416 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Hindsman v. Morris
174 S.E. 639 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)