Hester v. Dreyer
This text of 92 S.E. 299 (Hester v. Dreyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “While a married woman may not contract a debt of suretyship that will hind her, she may, as an original undertaker, become liable for goods furnished to another from which she derives no personal benefit.” Freeman v. Coleman, 86 Ga. 590 (12 S. E. 1064); Finch v. Barclay, 87 Ga. 393 (13 S. E. 566).
2. “A judgment overruling a motion for a new trial is not an error of law which can he corrected in this court, where no material error of law [817]*817was committed during the trial, and where there is any evidencS upon which the verdict could have been based. A verdict can not be set aside by this court merely because it is against the weight of evidence. Applying the foregoing to the facts as they appear in the present record, the judgment overruling the motion for new trial must be affirmed.” Randall v. Bell, 12 Ga. App. 614 (77 S. E. 1132).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 299, 19 Ga. App. 816, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hester-v-dreyer-gactapp-1917.