Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird
92 S.E. 287, 19 Ga. App. 808, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 372
Opinion
1. “This court has no power to determine that the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of one party to a cause rather than the other, or to award a new trial in any case where there is any evidence sufficient to support the verdict.” Bunn v. Hargraves, 3 Ga. App. 518 (60 S. E. 223); Wilson v. Barnard, 10 Ga. App. 90 (8), 99 (72 S. E. 943) ; Randall v. Bell, 12 Ga. App. 614 (77 S. E. 1132).
2. The trial judge did not err either in admitting the testimony complained of or in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird, 92 S.E. 287, 19 Ga. App. 808, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
92 S.E. 287 (Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wise v. Ray
112 S.E. 904 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)
Howard v. State
97 S.E. 83 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Bradham v. State
94 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)