Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird

92 S.E. 287, 19 Ga. App. 808, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 372

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 25, 1917

Docket8062

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 92 S.E. 287 (Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird, 92 S.E. 287, 19 Ga. App. 808, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 372 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. “This court has no power to determine that the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of one party to a cause rather than the other, or to award a new trial in any case where there is any evidence sufficient to support the verdict.” Bunn v. Hargraves, 3 Ga. App. 518 (60 S. E. 223); Wilson v. Barnard, 10 Ga. App. 90 (8), 99 (72 S. E. 943) ; Randall v. Bell, 12 Ga. App. 614 (77 S. E. 1132).

2. The trial judge did not err either in admitting the testimony complained of or in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI