Ramirez v. United States
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MIGUELRAMIREZ, SSS Plaintiff, 22 CIVIL 6981 (GHW) -against- JUDGMENT UNITED STATES, Defendant. wn It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated July 21, 2023, the Petition was not timely filed, and equitable tolling of the statute of limitations is not warranted, the Petition is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Mr. Ramirez has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, so the Court denies a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 671 in Case No. 1:17-cr-290-GHW. The Clerk of Court is also directed to terminate all outstanding motions in Miguel Ramriez v. United States, Case No. 1:22- cv-6981-GHW, to enter judgment for the United States in that case; accordingly, the case is closed. DATED: New York, New York July 24, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerkof Court BY: ABrUal Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ramirez v. United States (Ramirez v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.