Ramirez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Ramirez v. People

43 P.3d 611, 2001 WL 1079475

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 17, 2001·No. 99SC814·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 997 P.2d 1200 (Colo. App.1999), should be affirmed; whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 997 P.2d 1200 (Colo. App.1999), should be affirmed; whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Ramirez v. People, 43 P.3d 611, 2001 WL 1079475 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

43 P.3d 611 (Ramirez v. People) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related