Ramirez v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Ramirez v. People

43 P.3d 611, 2001 WL 1079475

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedSeptember 17, 2001

Docket99SC814

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 43 P.3d 611 (Ramirez v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ramirez v. People, 43 P.3d 611, 2001 WL 1079475 (Colo. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 997 P.2d 1200 (Colo. App.1999), should be affirmed; whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Kourlis, Justice Hobbs and Justice Rice are of the opinion that the judgment of the court of appeals, 997 P.2d 1200 (Colo. App.1999), should be affirmed; whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Martinez, and Justice Bender are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Coats does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed by operation of law. See C.A.R. 85(e).

Justice COATS does not participate.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 P.3d 611, 2001 WL 1079475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramirez-v-people-colo-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack