Ramac Explosives, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation
This text of 319 A.2d 65 (Ramac Explosives, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in its opinion reported in 125 N. J. Super. 154 (1973) except that we withhold our approval of that part of the opinion which states that the pattern of the New Jersey Sales and Use Tax Act (N. J. S. A. 54:32B-1, et seq.) “is to tax only the end product of a process.” This statement may be too broadly put and in any event was unnecessary to the court’s conclusion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
319 A.2d 65, 64 N.J. 551, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ramac-explosives-inc-v-director-division-of-taxation-nj-1974.