Ralph Geise v. United States

265 F.2d 659, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1959
Docket16048
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 265 F.2d 659 (Ralph Geise v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph Geise v. United States, 265 F.2d 659, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043 (9th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a rehearing is denied. The gist of the matter here is that the rule is well settled that under the circumstances of this case some persons may properly be excluded from the court room. Cf. People v. Jelke, 308 N. Y. 56, 123 N.E.2d 769, 772, 48 A.L.R.2d 1425. That is our holding here. We also hold that appellant cannot complain of the failure of the court to revoke its exclusion order after the minor witness had testified, since appellant made no request therefor. That is particularly true in this case which is not an appeal from the conviction, but an attempted collateral attack on the judgment.

Petitioner does not question the possibility of appellant’s waiving his rights to such revocation of the order. Cf. Gibson v. United States, 9 Cir., 31 F.2d 19, 22. What he says is that “this overlooks the fact that the accused cannot waive the public’s right to a public trial.” The Sixth Amendment right to a public trial is a right of the accused, and of the accused only. Cf. United Press Ass’ns v. Valente, 308 N.Y. 71, 123 N.E. 2d 777, 781; United States v. Sorren-tino, 3 Cir., 175 F.2d 721, 723.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. State
827 So. 2d 269 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Butterfield
784 P.2d 153 (Utah Supreme Court, 1989)
United States v. Fiske
28 M.J. 1013 (U S Air Force Court of Military Review, 1989)
State v. Blake
633 P.2d 831 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1981)
Cumbee v. Commonwealth
254 S.E.2d 112 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1979)
United States v. Callie Blaine Eisner
533 F.2d 987 (Sixth Circuit, 1976)
TIMES NEWS. LTD.(GR. BRIT.) v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
387 F. Supp. 189 (C.D. California, 1974)
United States Ex Rel. Smallwood v. LaValle
377 F. Supp. 1148 (E.D. New York, 1974)
Anderson v. People
490 P.2d 47 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1971)
RLR v. State
487 P.2d 27 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1971)
United States Ex Rel. Mayberry v. Yeager
321 F. Supp. 199 (D. New Jersey, 1971)
Maryann Weissman and Key Martin v. United States
387 F.2d 271 (Tenth Circuit, 1967)
State v. Jackson
203 A.2d 1 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1964)
People v. Rivera Romero
83 P.R. 452 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1961)
Pueblo v. Rivera Romero
83 P.R. Dec. 471 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 F.2d 659, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-geise-v-united-states-ca9-1959.