Ralph Bryan Ellison v. United States

324 F.2d 710
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedNovember 26, 1963
Docket7321_1
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 324 F.2d 710 (Ralph Bryan Ellison v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ralph Bryan Ellison v. United States, 324 F.2d 710 (10th Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant is here for the third time seeking relief from a sentence imposed for narcotic violations. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 263 F.2d 395, and Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 283 F.2d 489, certiorari denied 365 U.S. 885, 81 S.Ct. 1038, 6 L.Ed.2d 196. The present proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is based on the previously unasserted claim that the appellant was mentally incompetent at the time of his plea of guilty. The trial court denied relief without a hearing.

Whatever doubt may have existed after Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835, and Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, over the right of a petitioner to claim in a § 2255 proceeding that a guilty plea was not made voluntarily and knowingly, was removed by Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148. When such a claim is presented it may not be denied without a hearing. In exercising its discretionary powers to direct the form and extent of the hearing the trial court is governed by the admonitions appearing in Machibroda, 368 U.S. at pp. 495-496, 82 S.Ct. 514, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, and in Sanders, 373 U.S. at pp. 20-23, 83 S.Ct. 1079-1081, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the views here expressed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Barnes
551 F. Supp. 22 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1982)
Billy Mason Eskridge v. United States
443 F.2d 440 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Raymond Miranda
437 F.2d 1255 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Arthur E. Burke v. United States
427 F.2d 465 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Sisson v. Page
279 F. Supp. 614 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1968)
Von Pickrell v. People
431 P.2d 1003 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1967)
Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United States
365 F.2d 368 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
Paul Handy Nunley v. United States
364 F.2d 825 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Edwin B. Butler v. United States
361 F.2d 869 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
James E. France v. United States
358 F.2d 946 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Gerald L. Stone v. United States
358 F.2d 503 (Ninth Circuit, 1966)
United States v. Molino
240 F. Supp. 332 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Berl Estes McDonald v. United States
341 F.2d 378 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)
Charles R. Luse v. United States
326 F.2d 338 (Tenth Circuit, 1964)
James William Nipp v. United States
324 F.2d 711 (Tenth Circuit, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 F.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ralph-bryan-ellison-v-united-states-ca10-1963.