Berl Estes McDonald v. United States

341 F.2d 378
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided February 3, 1965·No. 7922_1·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

The trial court denied without hearing appellant’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 from a 10-year sentence imposed on his plea of guilty to a charge of assault with intent to murder. At the time of the commission of the crime appellant- was an inmate of the United States penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas. One of the grounds asserted for relief is mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea. When such a claim is raised the § 2255 motion may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Nipp v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 711, and Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir.,. 324 F.2d 710, and cases therein cited.

Reversed and remanded with directions to grant appellant a hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Berl Estes McDonald v. United States, 341 F.2d 378 (10th Cir. 1965).

341 F.2d 378 (Berl Estes McDonald v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Raymond Casey v. United States
940 F.2d 671 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)
United States v. Barnes
551 F. Supp. 22 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1982)
United States v. Raymond Miranda
437 F.2d 1255 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Chester A. Schutz v. United States
432 F.2d 25 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Paul Handy Nunley v. United States
364 F.2d 825 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Edwin B. Butler v. United States
361 F.2d 869 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Berl Estes McDonald v. United States
356 F.2d 980 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)