James William Nipp v. United States

324 F.2d 711
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided November 26, 1963·No. 7222_1·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant pleaded guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312. He seeks relief from the sentence imposed and asserts mental incompetence at the time of the guilty plea. The trial court treated his petition for coram nobis as an application under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denied it without a hearing.

A claim of mental incompetence at the time of a guilty plea may be raised under § 2255 and, when raised, may not be disposed of without a hearing. See Ellison v. United States, 10 Cir., 324 F.2d 710, decided today. As in Ellison we direct the attention of the trial court to the admonitions appearing in Machibroda v. United States, 368 U.S. 487, 495-496, 82 S.Ct. 510, 7 L.Ed.2d 473, and in Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 20-23, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the views here expressed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James William Nipp v. United States, 324 F.2d 711 (10th Cir. 1963).

324 F.2d 711 (James William Nipp v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Barnes
551 F. Supp. 22 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1982)
Billy Mason Eskridge v. United States
443 F.2d 440 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Raymond Miranda
437 F.2d 1255 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Arthur E. Burke v. United States
427 F.2d 465 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United States
365 F.2d 368 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
Paul Handy Nunley v. United States
364 F.2d 825 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Edwin B. Butler v. United States
361 F.2d 869 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
James E. France v. United States
358 F.2d 946 (Tenth Circuit, 1966)
Berl Estes McDonald v. United States
341 F.2d 378 (Tenth Circuit, 1965)