Ralon v. Kaiser Permanente Hospital

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DOMITILA PELAEZ RALON, Case No. 23-cv-03344-JCS (EMC) 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 9 Vv. REPLACE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., et al., Docket No. 100 Defendants. a 12

Before the Court is Plaintiffs second motion to replace Magistrate Judge Spero with a © 15 || District Judge. See Docket No. 100. Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. Plaintiff has again failed to 16 || establish good cause or extraordinary circumstances to vacate her consent to a Magistrate Judge.

= 17 Branch y. Umphenour, 936 F.3d 994, 1004-1005 (9th Cir. 2019).

Z 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: June 10, 2025 22 23 EDWA . CHEN 24 United States District Judge 25 26 27 28