Home/Seventh Circuit/Rakestraw v. United Airlines, Inc.

Rakestraw v. United Airlines, Inc.

989 F.2d 944
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 1993
DocketNos. 91-2285, 91-2416, 91-2417, 91-2502, 91-2503, 91-2535 and 91-2957
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 989 F.2d 944 (Rakestraw v. United Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rakestraw v. United Airlines, Inc., 989 F.2d 944 (7th Cir. 1993).

Opinions

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

Petitions for rehearing were filed by the plaintiffs in each of these two consolidated cases. All of the judges on the panel voted to deny rehearing, and the petitions are accordingly denied.

A judge in active service called for a vote on the suggestions of rehearing in banc, which failed to obtain a majority. Judges Flaum and Ripple voted for rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stone v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc.
841 F. Supp. 1181 (N.D. Georgia, 1993)
Lee Rakestraw, Cross-Appellants v. United Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, International, Cross-Appellee. David A. Hammond v. Air Line Pilots Association and Trans World Airlines, Inc.
989 F.2d 944 (Seventh Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
989 F.2d 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rakestraw-v-united-airlines-inc-ca7-1993.