Railroad Commission v. Macmillan

287 U.S. 576, 53 S. Ct. 223
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 12, 1932·No. No. 32·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Decree reversed and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535, 536; U. S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. Tariff Comm’n, 274 U. S. 106, 112.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Railroad Commission v. Macmillan, 287 U.S. 576, 53 S. Ct. 223 (1932).

287 U.S. 576 (Railroad Commission v. Macmillan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acheson v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Acheson, Secretary of State v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)
Burford v. Sun Oil Co.
319 U.S. 315 (Supreme Court, 1943)
Rivers v. Miller
112 F.2d 439 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)
Cullen v. Ellis County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 3
77 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1934)
O'Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co.
292 U.S. 609 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Bender v. Donoghue
70 F.2d 723 (Fifth Circuit, 1934)
Danciger Oil & Rfg. Co. v. Smith
290 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1933)
First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.
290 U.S. 585 (Supreme Court, 1933)
C. M. Patten & Co. Et Al. v. United States
289 U.S. 705 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Coyne v. Prouty
289 U.S. 704 (Supreme Court, 1933)
Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Railroad Commission
122 Tex. 243 (Texas Supreme Court, 1933)