Coyne v. Prouty

289 U.S. 704, 53 S. Ct. 658
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 24, 1933·No. No. 260·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Decree reversed and cause remanded with directions to dismiss the bill of complaint upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536; U.S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U.S. 106, 112; Railroad Commission of Texas v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U.S. 704, 53 S. Ct. 658 (1933).

289 U.S. 704 (Coyne v. Prouty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acheson v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
Acheson, Secretary of State v. Droesse
197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)
United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.
340 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1950)
O'Ryan v. Mills Novelty Co.
292 U.S. 609 (Supreme Court, 1934)
Danciger Oil & Rfg. Co. v. Smith
290 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1933)
First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.
290 U.S. 585 (Supreme Court, 1933)