First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.

Supreme Court

First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.

290 U.S. 585, 54 S. Ct. 61, 78 L. Ed. 517, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 472

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 9, 1933·No. No. 184·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari herein is granted. On consideration of the suggestion of the respondent of a diminution of the record and of the motion for writ of certiorari to correct . the same, it is ordered that such writ be, and it is hereby, granted. It having been shown to the Court that this cause is moot (Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 653—658; Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536; Railroad Comm’n v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576), the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District [586] Court with directions to vacate the orders appealed from and to dismiss the proceedings as moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216; U.S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. Tariff Comm’n, 274 U.S. 106, 112; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U.S. 704.

Messrs. Rush C. Butler and Frank E. Harkness for petitioner. Messrs. Edwin M. Sims, Franklin J. Stransky, Silas H. Strawn, and John D. Black for respondents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari herein is granted. On consideration of the suggestion of the respondent of a diminution of the record and of the motion for writ of certiorari to correct . the same, it is ordered that such writ be, and it is hereby, granted. It having been shown to the Court that this cause is moot (Mills v. Green, 159 U.S. 651, 653—658; Jones v. Montague, 194 U.S. 147; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U.S. 528, 535, 536; Railroad Comm’n v. MacMillan, 287 U.S. 576), the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the District [586] Court with directions to vacate the orders appealed from and to dismiss the proceedings as moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U.S. 216; U.S. ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. Tariff Comm’n, 274 U.S. 106, 112; Coyne v. Prouty, 289 U.S. 704.

Messrs. Rush C. Butler and Frank E. Harkness for petitioner. Messrs. Edwin M. Sims, Franklin J. Stransky, Silas H. Strawn, and John D. Black for respondents.

First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U.S. 585, 54 S. Ct. 61, 78 L. Ed. 517, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 472 (1933).

Pincite

290 U.S. 585 (First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related