Railroad Co. v. James

73 U.S. 750, 18 L. Ed. 854, 6 Wall. 750, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 1022
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 16, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 73 U.S. 750 (Railroad Co. v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Railroad Co. v. James, 73 U.S. 750, 18 L. Ed. 854, 6 Wall. 750, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 1022 (1868).

Opinion

Mr. Justice NELSON

delivered the opinion of the court.

The La Crosse and Milwaukee Company, by virtue of its charter and the proceedings under it, acquired a title in fee to the road-bed; and the rolling stock owned by it, and used and employed in connection with the road, is made a fixture by an express statute of the State of Wisconsin, and such, we *752 think, is the law according to the true construction of the charter, independent of the statute. * By the statute law of Wisconsin judgments are liens on real estate, and we do not doubt but that this judgment became a lieu on the road from the time of its rendition, and that a sale under a decree in chancery, and conveyance in pursuance thereof, confirmed by the court, passed the whole of the interest of the company existing at the time of its rendition to the purchaser.

A great many objections have been taken to the decrees below, but those of any substance or force will be found answered by the principles above stated.

Decrees affirmed.

*

Pennock v. Coe, 23 Howard, 117.

Pennock v. Coe, 23 Howard, 117 ; Gue v. Tide Water Canal Co., 24 Id. 257; 2 Redfield, 544 and n.; Covington Co. v. Shepherd, 21 Howard, 112; Macon and Western Railroad Co. v. Parker, 9 Georgia, 377

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gunnison v. Chicago, M. & ST. P. Ry. Co.
117 F. 629 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin, 1902)
National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto Water Co.
52 F. 43 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin, 1892)
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Boney
3 L.R.A. 435 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)
People v. O'Brien
52 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 519 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)
Barnes v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway
122 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Howard v. Railway Co.
101 U.S. 837 (Supreme Court, 1880)
Williamson v. New Jersey Southern Railroad
29 N.J. Eq. 311 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1878)
Vermont & Canada Railroad v. Vermont Central Railroad
50 Vt. 500 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1877)
Williamson v. New Jersey Southern Railroad
28 N.J. Eq. 277 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 U.S. 750, 18 L. Ed. 854, 6 Wall. 750, 1867 U.S. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/railroad-co-v-james-scotus-1868.