Radeljak v. DaimlerCHRYSLER CORP.
This text of 697 N.W.2d 524 (Radeljak v. DaimlerCHRYSLER CORP.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RADELJAK
v.
DaimlerCHRYSLER CORP.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
SC: 127679. COA: 247781.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties are directed to include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the public interest factors of the forum non conveniens doctrine set forth in Cray v. General Motors Corp., 389 Mich. 382, 396, 207 N.W.2d 393 (1973), should be revised or modified; and (2) whether, even if another more appropriate forum exists, a Michigan court may not resist jurisdiction unless its own forum is "seriously inconvenient." See Roby v. Ford Motor Co., 155 Mich.App. 643, 645, 400 N.W.2d 610 (1986).
The Michigan Trial Lawyers Association, the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, and the Michigan Manufacturers Association are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 N.W.2d 524, 472 Mich. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/radeljak-v-daimlerchrysler-corp-mich-2005.