Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.

Ninth Circuit

Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.

554 F.3d 769, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2259, 2009 WL 224544

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2009

Docket07-55282

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 554 F.3d 769 (Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc., 554 F.3d 769, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2259, 2009 WL 224544 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinions

Order; Concurrence by Judge WARDLAW; Dissent by Judge IKUTA.

ORDER

Judges Pregerson, Wardlaw, and Leigh-ton voted to deny Appellees’ petition for panel rehearing. Judges Pregerson and Wardlaw also voted to deny Appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Leighton so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Judge Bybee was re-cused.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI