Quinones v. Lee

S.D. New York

Quinones v. Lee

DecidedDecember 19, 2023

Docket7:20-cv-04621

StatusUnknown

This text of Quinones v. Lee (Quinones v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quinones v. Lee, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICARDOQUINONES. SSS™~S Petitioner, 20 CIVIL 4621 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT WILLIAM LEE, Superintendent, Respondent. wa eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 19, 2023, the Court finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the R&R. Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED, and the R&R is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. Judgment is entered accordingly, and the case is closed. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Dated: New York, New York December 19, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICARDOQUINONES. SSS™~S Petitioner, 20 CIVIL 4621 (VB) -against- JUDGMENT WILLIAM LEE, Superintendent, Respondent. wa eK

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 19, 2023, the Court finds no error, clear or otherwise, in the R&R. Accordingly, petitioner's objections are OVERRULED, and the R&R is adopted in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED. Judgment is entered accordingly, and the case is closed. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). Dated: New York, New York December 19, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

BY: ER Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Quinones v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinones-v-lee-nysd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack