Quinones v. Lee

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 1, 2020·No. 7:20-cv-04621·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICARDO QUINONES, Petitioner, 20-CV-4621 (CM) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL WILLIAM LEE, Respondent. COLLEEN McMAHON, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated July 2, 2020, the Court directed Petitioner, within thirty days, to submit a completed request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”) or pay the $5.00 in fees required to file a habeas corpus petition in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petition. Petitioner has not filed an IFP application or paid the fee. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Petitioner has not at this time made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 1, 2020 , New York, New York hie. Iu Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quinones v. Lee, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Quinones v. Lee (Quinones v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)