Quinn v. Pennsylvania Railroad

67 A. 949, 219 Pa. 24, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 596
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 25, 1907·No. Appeal, No. 284·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Brown,

Error was committed in making this order, but we cannot now correct it. The order was an interlocutory one, and the appeal from it must be quashed: Logan et al. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 132 Pa. 403. For refusal to comply with it the penalty will not be attachment for contempt, but the statutory one of judgment by default for the plaintiff. Until such judgment .is taken the defendant cannot be harmed by the court’s order to produce the daily distribution sheets. If it should be. taken, on appeal from it, in reversing it, our reasons will be given -why the order should not have been made.

Appeal quashed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quinn v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 67 A. 949, 219 Pa. 24, 1907 Pa. LEXIS 596 (Pa. 1907).

67 A. 949 (Quinn v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quijada v. Unifrutti of America Inc.
12 Pa. D. & C.4th 225 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)
Sanderbeck v. Sanderbeck
476 A.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1984)
Commonwealth ex rel. Bittner v. Price
235 A.2d 357 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)
MacKowain v. Gulf Oil Corp.
87 A.2d 314 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
Whetsel v. Shaw
22 A.2d 751 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Slattery
19 Pa. D. & C. 483 (Schuylkill County Court of Common Pleas, 1933)