Commonwealth ex rel. Bittner v. Price
This text of 235 A.2d 357 (Commonwealth ex rel. Bittner v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion
The appellant, Edward Bittner, following a coroner’s inquest, was held on the charge of murder pending action by the grand jury. An action in habeas corpus was instituted which the lower court dismissed. Subsequently, Bittner was indicted by the grand jury for [6]*6murder and involuntary manslaughter. Later, this appeal was filed from the order below dismissing the habeas corpus action.
We need not reach the question of whether or not the indictments returned by the grand jury rendered the issues raised by this appeal moot, since the appeal is from an unappealable order and must be quashed.
The appellant does not seek release on bail and under such circumstances the pretrial order refusing a writ of habeas corpus is interlocutory, from which, absent exceptional circumstances, an appeal does not lie. Cf. Commonwealth v. Pollick, 420 Pa. 61, 215 A. 2d 904 (1966), and Commonwealth ex rel. Fisher v. Stitzel, 418 Pa. 356, 211 A. 2d 457 (1965).
Appeal quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.2d 357, 428 Pa. 5, 1967 Pa. LEXIS 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-ex-rel-bittner-v-price-pa-1967.