Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Opinion
Case: 19-1437 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 03/16/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________
2019-1437 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 01417. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by MICHAEL CHAOCHA TING.
NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, JOSEPH PALYS; PAUL ANDERSON, Houston, TX. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is Case: 19-1437 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 03/16/2020
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 16, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.