Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
This text of Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 19-1473 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 02/05/2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee ______________________
2019-1473 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 01416. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by KEVIN CHRISTOPHER JONES.
NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS; PAUL ANDERSON, Houston, TX. ______________________ Case: 19-1473 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 02/05/2020
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 5, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Promos Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/promos-technologies-inc-v-samsung-electronics-co-ltd-cafc-2020.