Priester v. R. F. H. Realty Corp.

13 Misc. 2d 446, 180 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3106
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 17, 1958·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants, having terminated plaintiff’s employment, had the right to evict him. Notice given by certified mail was received by the plaintiff. The eviction did not constitute a conversion of plaintiff’s goods; neither did the subsequent storage of them in the basement. (Bowers, Law of Conversion, § 3, p. 3.) The loss or damage, if any, caused by flood was accidental and did not constitute conversion. (Salt Springs Nat. Bank v. Wheeler, 48 N. Y. 492, 495; Magnin v. Dimsmore, 70 N. Y. 410, 417.)

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law, without costs, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — Pette, Hart and Brown, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Priester v. R. F. H. Realty Corp., 13 Misc. 2d 446, 180 N.Y.S.2d 617, 1958 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

13 Misc. 2d 446 (Priester v. R. F. H. Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jo ex rel. Mee Jin-Jo v. JPMC Specialty Mortgage, LLC
131 F. Supp. 3d 53 (W.D. New York, 2015)
Jo v. JPMC Specialty Mortgage, LLC
135 F. Supp. 3d 54 (W.D. New York, 2015)
Wilson v. CRL Management, Inc.
14 Misc. 3d 231 (Rochester City Court, 2006)
Incorporated Village of Hempstead v. Jablonsky
187 Misc. 2d 792 (New York Supreme Court, 2001)
3505 Realty Corp. v. Smith
28 Misc. 2d 588 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)