Price v. Stewart
This text of 72 S.E.2d 459 (Price v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. There are two assignments of error in the bill of exceptions in the instant case. The first assigns error upon the judgment of the court below overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea in abatement. “The judgment overruling the demurrer was not a final judgment, nor would a judgment sustaining the demurrer, as sought by the plaintiff, have been a final disposition of the case.” Van Ormer v. Harris, 184 Ga. 411 (191 S. E. 378). See also cases there cited.
2. The second assignment of error is on the judgment of the court below sustaining the defendant’s plea in abatement. A judgment sustaining or overruling a plea in abatement is not such a final judgment as can be made the subject of a bill of exceptions to this court within Code (Ann.) § 6-701. See City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (85 S. E. 755); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Williams, 146 Ga. 27 (90 S. E. 478); Legg v. Legg, 166 Ga. 319 (143 S. E. 385).
3. Accordingly, the bill of exceptions in the instant case is premature, and must be
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
72 S.E.2d 459, 209 Ga. 339, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/price-v-stewart-ga-1952.