Price v. Stewart

72 S.E.2d 459, 209 Ga. 339, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 489
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided September 2, 1952·No. 17935·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Wyatt, Justice.

1. There are two assignments of error in the bill of exceptions in the instant case. The first assigns error upon the judgment of the court below overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the plea in abatement. “The judgment overruling the demurrer was not a final judgment, nor would a judgment sustaining the demurrer, as sought by the plaintiff, have been a final disposition of the case.” Van Ormer v. Harris, 184 Ga. 411 (191 S. E. 378). See also cases there cited.

2. The second assignment of error is on the judgment of the court below sustaining the defendant’s plea in abatement. A judgment sustaining or overruling a plea in abatement is not such a final judgment as can be made the subject of a bill of exceptions to this court within Code (Ann.) § 6-701. See City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (85 S. E. 755); Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Williams, 146 Ga. 27 (90 S. E. 478); Legg v. Legg, 166 Ga. 319 (143 S. E. 385).

3. Accordingly, the bill of exceptions in the instant case is premature, and must be

Dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P.J., and Almand, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Price v. Stewart, 72 S.E.2d 459, 209 Ga. 339, 1952 Ga. LEXIS 489 (Ga. 1952).

72 S.E.2d 459 (Price v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Elliott v. Service Trust & Savings
129 S.E.2d 203 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)
Byram v. State Highway Department
119 S.E.2d 129 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Carter v. Clements
107 S.E.2d 257 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Smith v. State
104 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Whitlock Equipment Co. v. Kirby
96 S.E.2d 543 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Price v. Stewart
74 S.E.2d 458 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)