Whitlock Equipment Co. v. Kirby

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Whitlock Equipment Co. v. Kirby

96 S.E.2d 543, 95 Ga. App. 1, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 692

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 22, 1957·No. 36500·Published

Opinion

Townsend, J.

The only assignments of error in this bill of exceptions are to the order of the trial court overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s cross-action and sustaining the defendant’s oral motion to strike the plaintiff’s plea of the statute of limitations directed to the cross-action. Such assignments of error are not reviewable by direct writ of error before final disposition of the case in the trial court. Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 184 Ga. 178 (190 S. E. 584); Price v. Stewart, 209 Ga. 339 (72 S. E. 2d 459); Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Terrell, 155 Ga. 374 (116 S. E. 793). Accordingly, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townsend, J.

The only assignments of error in this bill of exceptions are to the order of the trial court overruling the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendant’s cross-action and sustaining the defendant’s oral motion to strike the plaintiff’s plea of the statute of limitations directed to the cross-action. Such assignments of error are not reviewable by direct writ of error before final disposition of the case in the trial court. Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 184 Ga. 178 (190 S. E. 584); Price v. Stewart, 209 Ga. 339 (72 S. E. 2d 459); Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Terrell, 155 Ga. 374 (116 S. E. 793). Accordingly, the writ of error must be

Dismissed.

Gardner, P. J., and Carlisle, J., concur.

Whitlock Equipment Co. v. Kirby, 96 S.E.2d 543, 95 Ga. App. 1, 1957 Ga. App. LEXIS 692 (Ga. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

96 S.E.2d 543 (Whitlock Equipment Co. v. Kirby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related