Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Williams
90 S.E. 478, 146 Ga. 27, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 562
Opinion
Under the decision in the case of City of Tallapoosa v. Brock, 143 Ga. 599 (85 S. E. 755), a direct bill of exceptions will not lie to a judgment overruling a plea in abatement to a suit brought for the recovery of damages for personal injuries, which is the case presented by this record. Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Williams, 90 S.E. 478, 146 Ga. 27, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 562 (Ga. 1916).
90 S.E. 478 (Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
75 S.E.2d 177 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Price v. Stewart
72 S.E.2d 459 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK OF CEDARTOWN v. Chapman
71 S.E.2d 425 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952)
Beard v. Beard
22 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Harris v. State
10 S.E.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Van Ormer v. Harris
191 S.E. 378 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Colonial Stages South Inc. v. Levy
166 S.E. 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Caison v. State
154 S.E. 297 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Futch v. State
139 S.E. 110 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Douglas v. Hardin
136 S.E. 793 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Chatham Motor Co. v. Lincoln Motor Co.
120 S.E. 444 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
English v. Rosenkrantz
105 S.E. 292 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)