Presti v. Schalck

26 A.D.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3484
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 22, 1966·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs, on the court’s own motion. Memorandum: The order directing plaintiffs to answer certain questions at a pretrial examination was not appealable as a matter of right (Brimberg v. Frielich, 10 A D 2d 850; Brown v. Golden, 6 A D 2d 766) and appellants failed to obtain the required permission to appeal (CPLR 5701, subd. [e]). (Appeal from order of Niagara Special Term requiring plaintiffs to answer certain questions and make full disclosure of all matters pertaining to said questions.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Presti v. Schalck, 26 A.D.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3484 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 793 (Presti v. Schalck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vicki v. City of Niagara Falls
2021 NY Slip Op 06275 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
MAYER, WILLIAM J. v. HOANG, HENRY
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011
Mayer v. Hoang
83 A.D.3d 1516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Berecz v. Reszel
50 A.D.3d 1554 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP
21 A.D.3d 1407 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Maisch v. Millard Fillmore Hospitals
309 A.D.2d 1187 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Roggow v. Walker
303 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Rick v. Campione
295 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)