Presti v. Schalck
This text of 26 A.D.2d 793 (Presti v. Schalck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs, on the court’s own motion. Memorandum: The order directing plaintiffs to answer certain questions at a pretrial examination was not appealable as a matter of right (Brimberg v. Frielich, 10 A D 2d 850; Brown v. Golden, 6 A D 2d 766) and appellants failed to obtain the required permission to appeal (CPLR 5701, subd. [e]). (Appeal from order of Niagara Special Term requiring plaintiffs to answer certain questions and make full disclosure of all matters pertaining to said questions.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.2d 793, 275 N.Y.S.2d 36, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/presti-v-schalck-nyappdiv-1966.