Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP

21 A.D.3d 1407, 801 N.Y.S.2d 205

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2005·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered December 8, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendant Brody & Weiss Zucarelli & Urbanek CPA’s, PC to compel the continued deposition of and answers to certain questions by a partner in defendant Hodgson Russ LLP

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Presti v Schalck, 26 AD2d 793 [1966]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered December 8, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendant Brody & Weiss Zucarelli & Urbanek CPA’s, PC to compel the continued deposition of and answers to certain questions by a partner in defendant Hodgson Russ LLP

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Presti v Schalck, 26 AD2d 793 [1966]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP, 21 A.D.3d 1407, 801 N.Y.S.2d 205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

21 A.D.3d 1407 (Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related