Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP

Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP

21 A.D.3d 1407, 801 N.Y.S.2d 205
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 30, 2005
StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.3d 1407 (Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shotell v. Hodgson Russ LLP, 21 A.D.3d 1407, 801 N.Y.S.2d 205 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered December 8, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendant Brody & Weiss Zucarelli & Urbanek CPA’s, PC to compel the continued deposition of and answers to certain questions by a partner in defendant Hodgson Russ LLP

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Presti v Schalck, 26 AD2d 793 [1966]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Presti v. Schalck
26 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 A.D.3d 1407, 801 N.Y.S.2d 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotell-v-hodgson-russ-llp-nyappdiv-2005.