Pressley v. Bruce Post Vfw Memorial Home, Inc
This text of 462 N.W.2d 830 (Pressley v. Bruce Post Vfw Memorial Home, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Defendants appeal from a judgment of the circuit court entered in favor of plaintiff following a jury trial in the amount of $5,000 on a premises liability claim. The jury had awarded $10,000 in damages but reduced it after it found plaintiff fifty percent negligent. We affirm.
Plaintiff was injured when he fell from a seawall maintained by defendants. Plaintiff apparently tripped on a metal spike protruding from the seawall. Plaintiff had used the seawall for fishing over a period of time with the knowledge and approval of defendants.
The danger in this case, the exposed metal spike, was open and obvious. This was established by plaintiff’s admission that he was aware of the spike’s existence. He had, in fact, previously tried without success to remove it.
We believe that this case is controlled by Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corp, 182 Mich App 259; 451 NW2d 590 (1990). In Riddle this Court reasoned that, if the encounter with a known or obvious danger has the effect of excusing the landowner’s duty, we would be back to the doctrine of [711]*711contributory negligence as an absolute bar to recovery. We agree with Riddle.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 N.W.2d 830, 185 Mich. App. 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pressley-v-bruce-post-vfw-memorial-home-inc-michctapp-1990.