Preddy v. Herren Sales Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Preddy v. Herren Sales Co.

110 So. 131, 215 Ala. 216, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 379

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJune 10, 1926

Docket7 Div. 655.

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 110 So. 131 (Preddy v. Herren Sales Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Preddy v. Herren Sales Co., 110 So. 131, 215 Ala. 216, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 379 (Ala. 1926).

Pincite

Opinions

ANDERSON, C. J.

A final decree was rendered in this cause November 18, 1925. Thereafter the appellant moved the court to set aside said decree, and, after being passed from time to time, the motion was overruled February 16, 1926, and it is from this last decree overruling the motion that this appeal is prosecuted. This decree will not support an appeal, which must be dismissed upon the authority of Wood v. Finney, 207 Ala. 160, 92 So. 264.

Appeal dismissed.

SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ANDERSON, C. J.

A final decree was rendered in this cause November 18, 1925. Thereafter the appellant moved the court to set aside said decree, and, after being passed from time to time, the motion was overruled February 16, 1926, and it is from this last decree overruling the motion that this appeal is prosecuted. This decree will not support an appeal, which must be dismissed upon the authority of Wood v. Finney, 207 Ala. 160, 92 So. 264.

Appeal dismissed.

SOMERVILLE, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 So. 131, 215 Ala. 216, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/preddy-v-herren-sales-co-ala-1926.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack