Cornelius v. Moore

94 So. 57, 208 Ala. 237, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 451
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMay 18, 1922
Docket6 Div. 578.
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 94 So. 57 (Cornelius v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cornelius v. Moore, 94 So. 57, 208 Ala. 237, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 451 (Ala. 1922).

Opinions

ANDERSON, C. J.

An action of ejectment was brought in the circuit court by the appellants against the appellees, whereupon the appellees, the defendants in the lower court, filed a motion under section 2 of the Act of 1915, page 830, setting up an equitable defense and praying for a reformation of a, deed. The only decree rendered is. one ordering the transfer and dismissing a certain claim or declaration filed by the plaintiffs. There is no final decree or judgment, as the court has not determined whether or not the defendant was entitled to equitable relief. No equitable relief has been granted or denied, and we have no such final judgment or decree as will support this appeal. Section 2 authorizes the assignment of error of the order of transfer upon appeal from the final judgment or decree, hut does not authorize an appeal from the order of transfer. On the other hand, section 3 authorizes an assignment of error of the order of retransfer upon an appeal from a final judgment or decree of the court in which the case was retransferred. As the order or decree from which this appeal is prosecuted is not such a decree or judgment as will support the appeal, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the same, which is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

SAYRE, GARDNER, and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Conway v. Andrews
236 So. 2d 687 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1970)
Ex Parte Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
98 So. 2d 20 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
JAMES A. HEAD & COMPANY v. Rolling
90 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Robinson Co. v. Beck
74 So. 2d 915 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1954)
Nowell v. Nowell
50 So. 2d 270 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Montgomery v. Alabama Power Co.
34 So. 2d 573 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Denson
26 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1946)
Boswell v. Bethea
5 So. 2d 816 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
Zingelmann v. Turner
177 So. 627 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
State v. Mobile O. R. Co.
154 So. 91 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1934)
Pickens County v. Johnson
149 So. 252 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Jones v. Wright
133 So. 275 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1931)
Burns v. Lenoir
125 So. 661 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1930)
Preddy v. Herren Sales Co.
110 So. 131 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Smith v. Grayson
107 So. 448 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)
Ex Parte Gay
104 So. 900 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.
100 So. 843 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Lucas E. Moore Stave Co. v. Kennedy
101 So. 894 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Aust v. Sumter Farm & Stock Co.
96 So. 872 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1923)
Carey v. Hart
94 So. 298 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 So. 57, 208 Ala. 237, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cornelius-v-moore-ala-1922.