Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 9056
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 26, 2016·No. 01-15-00846-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-15-00846-CV Style: Predator Downhole, Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v Flotek Industries, Inc. Date motion filed*: January 19, 2016 Type of motion: Appellee’s Motion for Leave to file Appendix Under Seal Party filing motion: Appellee Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? Yes

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of prior extensions: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  The Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Appellant’s motion does not include a certificate of conference. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). Accordingly, the motion is denied. Nevertheless, the Court will consider any future motion filed in compliance with the rules.

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack 

Date: January 26, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc. (Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.