Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Tex. App. LEXIS 9056
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 5, 2016·No. 01-15-00846-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00846-CV

Trial court case number: 2013-64649

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to our January 26, 2016 abatement order, the trial court has filed a supplemental clerk’s record which states that exhibits were sealed in the trial court because they contain trade secrets consistent with the Texas Uniform Trade Secret Act. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §§ 134A.002(6), 134A.006 (West Supp. 2015). We therefore grant appellant’s motion to seal appendix exhibits 1-15, G, I, and J under seal. We further REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack  Acting individually

Date: April 5, 2016

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc. (Predator Downhole Inc. and Nancy Vermeulen v. Flotek Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 134A.002
Texas CP § 134A.002(6)