Poy v. Allan

Michigan Supreme Court

Poy v. Allan

209 N.W. 588, 235 Mich. 515, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 779

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJune 18, 1925

DocketDocket No. 17.

StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.W. 588 (Poy v. Allan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poy v. Allan, 209 N.W. 588, 235 Mich. 515, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 779 (Mich. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

A motion for rehearing was made in this cause and it was urged earnestly. The case was examined again very carefully by the Justices, and the motion was denied (231 Mich. 472). The substance of the motion was urged again on a petition for reconsideration. It was urged variously and with such zeal that the court as a matter of grace and out of an abundance of caution granted a rehearing. The case has been briefed again and argued at length. Upon full consideration we find no reason to depart from our former opinion.

Decree affirmed, with costs to defendants. *Page 516

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A motion for rehearing was made in this cause and it was urged earnestly. The case was examined again very carefully by the Justices, and the motion was denied (231 Mich. 472). The substance of the motion was urged again on a petition for reconsideration. It was urged variously and with such zeal that the court as a matter of grace and out of an abundance of caution granted a rehearing. The case has been briefed again and argued at length. Upon full consideration we find no reason to depart from our former opinion.

Decree affirmed, with costs to defendants. *Page 516

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 N.W. 588, 235 Mich. 515, 1925 Mich. LEXIS 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poy-v-allan-mich-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack